At the age of thirteen Giles was diagnosed with cancer. He didn’t allow a bone tumour in his arm to put an end to his swimming career. Today Giles is one of the most successful Paralympic swimmers of our time.
Giles is the proud owner of a total of seven Paralympic medals, but when he first showed them to people, the confused expression on their faces revealed that they didn’t know how special the medals were, because they simply didn’t understand the parameters of Paralympic sport.
Confusion around disability in sport
The general public is confused by disability in sport. This is compounded by a fear of offending people, so they keep questions they are bursting to ask like, “Why is a guy with one arm racing with a guy with one leg?” and “How come their wheelchair is different to theirs?” to themselves.
After Giles came back from Sydney in 2000 he had the idea to answer those types of questions in the form of LEXI.
LEXI is a graphic that helps people understand why different impairment types are grouped together by using human icons to show affected areas of the body. In combination with approved narration scripting, it crucially shows how a disability affects an athlete in a sport-specific way. For example, a disability that impacts a runner will impact a skier in a different way, which is different again for swimming. In fact, it’s different for every single one of the 27 competitive Paralympic sports. No wonder the people watching are confused.
“My dad always says if you’ve got a lot to say in a short space of time then draw a picture”
Giles thought he was onto something, and told a few people in the broadcasting industry about LEXI, in the hope that it might be used to support the Paralympics in Athens in 2004, but he didn’t get anywhere. He tried again 4 years later for Beijing in 2008. No one was interested.
Giles believes that the lack of interest in LEXI wasn’t about the product itself, or the quality of the graphic or the concept. The biggest challenge was culturally what LEXI represented. LEXI is about talking about disability. Prior to London 2012, the Paralympics actively tried to avoid talking about disability. The Paralympics was about sport, only sport. If you look at the camera shots of the 1996 Paralympics in Barcelona they rarely even showed disability.
It wasn’t until London 2012 that the culture for addressing disability in sport began to shift. It all started when the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) decided for the first time to sell the broadcast rights to the Paralympics separately from the rights for the Olympics.
Channel 4 won the broadcast rights. As part of the bid for the rights, Channel 4 had committed to explaining about the classification of Paralympic sport to the watching public. And it just so happened that Giles was asked in conversation if he had any ideas about how they might do this
So, he drew LEXI with a biro on a pad for the team at Channel 4.
Finally a breakthrough
Finally, Giles had the breakthrough he needed and LEXI was piloted at the Paralympic World Cup in Manchester in 2011
It was then, with LEXI out in the public domain that Giles realised he needed to protect his idea. And he needed to do it quickly. He was advised to make sure that he had copyright on everything, at every stage of development and that he had this in writing.
“It made me pretty unpopular – people were rolling their eyes every time I mentioned copyright – thank God I did because I wouldn’t have a business now if not.”
After the Manchester Paralympic World Cup, the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) said LEXI needed improvement. David Abrahams, the now outgoing CEO Channel 4 said for LEXI to make the cut it needed to be redrawn to look “more sporty”. The Paralympics were drawing close and there was a heightened nervousness about the topic of disability combined with extra anxiety about being a host country under a lot of scrutiny.
The time pressure of the Paralympics may have served the launch of LEXI well. With an immovable deadline fast approaching, people were forced to adopt a looser approach that would allow Channel 4 to meet the commitment it had made in its pitch for the rights to the London Paralympic Games.
Meet the superhumans
The 2012 Paralympics on Channel 4 was phenomenal. The ‘meet the superhumans’ campaign tackled sport and disability head-on. It is still massively powerful today. Remind yourself here.
London 2012 Paralympics saw viewing figures like never before. Six million people watched Jonnie Peacock win the men’s 100 meters. Six million people saw LEXI.
A focus group following the games said 85% of the audience approved of LEXI. And no one was offended by talk of disability (the thing everyone was afraid of).
Giles thought that after London 2012 developing LEXI would become easier.
He was wrong.
Despite the world-class Paralympic campaign by Channel 4, outstanding viewing figures and massively positive imagery, it took about two weeks for the entrenched mind-set of “we talk sport, not disability” to re-establish itself. Even with all the stats and data to back it up, many people just reverted to type.
The battle to change mind-sets continues. Rio 2016 was again successful and LEXI was used in the USA, Canada, Japan and Australia, as well as the UK giving it a potential audience reach of 500 million people. It had moved from 2D to 3D animated characters and there is less text on screen (which is an important consideration in multiple languages with massive differences in text length). This is what LEXI looks like today.
The next challenge for Giles is to get LEXI into the Paralympic host feed coverage – the coverage that the host country produces from which all other countries take their sports pictures from.
Giles will keep pushing LEXI because he is passionate about the Paralympics and knows first-hand that what athletes’ want is to have their story told to the world, a story partly of sporting performance, partly of disability but also of hopes, dreams and aspiration that anyone can have, regardless of their gender, sexuality or ability. Watch this space.
Making an idea happen
No idea operates in isolation; there were a series of things that lined up in the story of LEXI; the idea in Giles’ head, Channel 4 winning the broadcast rights and committing to a massive cultural shift to explain disability in sport.
Giles’ advice to anyone who is nursing an idea or an innovation is…
This blog was first published at Lucidity.
Recently I wrote a blog about how in striving for professionalism, we often leave our personalities at the door. This can be detrimental for both our organisations and for us.
But it got me thinking about some professional situations, like job interviews, pitching or presenting, and whether we can inadvertently dial-up our professionalism to our detriment when required to impress or perform.
Personality is important. Decision makers, (whether they are open about it or not) will be thinking, “Would I like to work with this person?”
At Lucidity, I deliver presentations, team days, keynote speeches and facilitate workshops.
I remember when I was a fledgling presenter wanting to improve, I attended a three-day presentation skills course. I was filmed presenting and then critiqued. They picked up ‘ums’ and ‘ahs’ and weird nervous things I did with my hands without realising. I took the feedback. Practiced. Did it again. Received feedback. Practiced and did it all again. It was a rather painful yet fundamental learning experience.
Everyone in the group finished the training and was able to present. We all completed the course a ‘professional presenter’; presenting in exactly the same way. We were blank canvases – empty vessels waiting for our ‘professional’ content to arrive. We all stood straight. We all stood still. We spoke slowly. Our hands made the shapes that reinforced what we said. We were textbook.
Then I started to really pay attention to great presenters, and noticed that they didn’t stand still or do any of the textbook things I had learned. The best presenters, in my opinion, brought the best parts of themselves onto the stage. If they had humour, they were funny. If they were outspoken, they shocked. If they were experts, they bought expertise. So I decided to do the same.
The blank canvas was still an excellent start, and over the years I’ve practiced putting ‘me’ back in to my presentations. Just the good bits – not the bit where I stand with one hip slanted so it looks like I’m flirting with the flip chart, or the nervous lip-chewing or the over use of the word ‘like’ inserted anxiously into sentences.
I also began to realise what was holding ‘me’ back: I was terrified of being heckled or forgetting what I was going to say.
So I took improv classes to help me respond better ‘in the moment’, and to manage my fear of slipping up (which still exists by the way – I think you need a healthy amount of adrenalin when presenting, but it’s how you manage it that’s important). I am no longer afraid to respond to the audience, or to go off track. And I now get much better feedback and results than when I was a professional blank canvas.
My advice for you if you want to improve your public speaking skills is;
As your confidence builds, you can add your personality back into the mix. It’s not a choice between professional or personality – it’s how you bring your true self to your professional life that will create the magic.
People work with people they know and like. Not everyone will like you, but if you over professionalise, you may accidentally loose the thing that makes you stand out. You
We won’t train you to be ‘professional’, we will train you to be your best you.
Right now the only thing that is certain is uncertainty. And you have a choice: You can choose to stick your head in the sand, pretend nothing is…
A guest blog by Vanessa Longley. What else are you doing while you are reading this blog? I’m guessing you’re doing at least one other activity. Most likely…
A guest blog by Iain McAndrew. Last week I met Ian Scott for lunch and a catch up in Edinburgh. Ian had recently supported us in a project…
A guest blog by Geraldine Osman. The world around us is changing, with most of us wanting access to information and constant communication from wherever we are and…