Dec
11

Author:

1 Comment

Building fundraising success: the importance of leadership

Corporate Photographer LondonA guest blog by Caroline Underwood.

Time and time again we see the critical role that leaders and trustees have on their charity’s major gift fundraising success.

I remember the enormous leap of faith that the leadership at Save the Children UK made when they created the role of Director of Philanthropy and Partnerships in 2007 for me. This was the first board-level fundraising position in the sector at the time and the appointment made national news.

Jasmine Whitbread, then CEO, had persuaded her Board of Trustees of the immense value that major gift fundraising could bring to the charity and its impact for children organisation – and the wider sector – in the face of decreasing government funding. Save the Children’s decision to back high value fundraising paid off. Alongside the excellent team of mass and community fundraisers led by Tanya Steele (now CEO of WWF) we built a team of over 80 fundraisers, tripled high-value income in 3 years, launched under the leadership of my corporate director Douglas Rouse a corporate programme that has continued to yield some of the best results in the sector and worked with Save the Children internationally to raise US$2.4 billion.

During a similar period, the University of Oxford had launched an extraordinarily ambitious campaign, Oxford Thinking – the biggest fundraising campaign in Europe, with a target of £1.25bn (in 2015 the University revised the target upwards to £3bn). At the helm from 2009 to 2015 was the charismatic Vice Chancellor, Professor Andrew Hamilton, who dedicated an incredible amount of time to work with the development teams and Director of Development Liesl Elder to build relationships with prospects and donors. Without him, his pro-vice chancellors, the college heads and senior academics supporting fundraising at the University, the campaign is unlikely to be have been successful.

This model holds true for smaller charities and organisations too. Just a fortnight ago we were thrilled to be part of a superb gala dinner at the Savoy Hotel by Stoll. We have worked with Stoll for a number of years delivering strategy and interim capacity but this was the first time that Stoll had taken such a bold step in its fundraising and brought together Trustees, supporters, donors towards the common goal of supporting vulnerable veterans. I don’t yet know the income achieved on the night but the biggest win was the energy and confidence of Stoll’s leadership at the event which in turn built confidence in donors and supporters.

With nearly every client or organisation that I have worked it is the level of commitment of the leadership that sets the parameters for fundraising success. Fundraising must be on the Board agenda.

But if you are a Trustee or leader, how do you develop the skills that make you effective in either fundraising directly or supporting the executive team? What do you need to know about major gift fundraising in order to lead from the front? My 5 top questions Boards should ask themselves are below. What are yours?

  1. An inspiring and well-articulated vision is critical to fundraising. Vision is a product of effective and inspiring leadership. Are you able to articulate your organisation’s vision in a succinct and compelling way?
  2. With increased public scrutiny and a very competitive environment your organisation needs a clear fundraising plan that is part of the overall strategy. Is this something that is considered by the board on a regular basis?
  3. The most common reason for donors not giving is that they are not asked. What arrangements have you got in place for monitoring the ‘pipeline’ of donors and for being updated on asks that are being made?
  4. Fundraisers are rarely successful if they are expected to operate in isolation – the whole organisation needs to get on board with the fundraising agenda. But what is the role of a Trustee in fundraising? Is it to ask, steward, support? Are you clear about your individual and collective role?
  5. To achieve results investment is needed. There is no ROI without I. It is the role of leadership to see the opportunities and to invest – and monitor wisely. What might investment look like for your organisation? What ROI can you expect from major gift fundraising in years 1,2,3?

To address these questions we have created Foundations in Philanthropy for Trustees and Leaders, in partnership with Ludicity. This one day seminar on 22nd February 2017 is designed to give you a practical understanding of how to enable your organisation to succeed in major gift fundraising and your role in achieving success. Find out more here.
Caroline Underwood is CEO at The Philanthropy Company. She  is a senior leader and an expert in fundraising and philanthropy. She works at the highest levels with chiefs of industry, philanthropists, celebrities and government leaders and is an experienced board member and senior manager.

Nov
28

Author:

Comment

The good and bad (mostly bad) of copycat strategies

pexels-photo-26791In his book and TED talk Where good ideas come from’, Stephen Johnson describes new ideas as simply combinations of old ideas put together in new ways.

I define innovation as what you do differently to achieve your mission, and if that different activity is new to you then it counts. For example, if you don’t have a regular giving programme, a stewardship programme or a mass participation event and you develop one, it’s your innovation. Own it.

According to Oscar Wilde, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but how do you like it when your best mate buys the same suit as you, your boss uses your carefully thought through analogies as their own or another charity copies your fundraising idea?

In my experience it sucks.

Organisations copy each other to try to gain competitive advantage. Some may even have strategies to be second to market to learn from the market leaders mistakes. There is nothing wrong with this. It’s life.

However, if our strategy is to copy our competitors we should be copying the best in class – not just the best in the charity sector. And we should be aiming to make our product offering better than the original.

In the not for profit sector there are so many copy cat examples. What often happens is rather than making better, more powerful and exciting products for our supporters and beneficiaries we dilute our offerings, the market becomes saturated and then like sheep-lemming hybrids we all move onto the next big thing until we saturate that too. This happens over and over again. For example:

– Greenpeace invented face-to-face fundraising in Austria in the 1990s. It was hugely successful. In the UK street fundraisers are now more commonly referred to as ‘chuggers’. Short for charity mugger. That’s how popular they are. Lets just stop and consider this for a moment. Charities are set up to solve important social and environmental problems. For street fundraisers to have been described as muggers, which has become common language is incredibly sad. The general public has been overwhelmed by the volume of street fundraising and it has been restricted by local councils to keep fundraisers off the high street.

– Charity advertising posters on train carriages were first pioneered by Open Fundraising in the UK in 2010. Other charities saw this was working and they all piled in with variations on a theme. In the first quarter of 2013 there was a 125% increase in charity adverts on trains. This prompted debate about placing restrictions on the amount of charity train adverts. A copycat strategy based purely on channel is flawed; the driver for the channel or channels you pick should be based on what your offer is to the audience you want to reach.

– Until last year, when the tragic death of charity supporter Olive Cook instigated undercover investigations into direct mail and telephone fundraising practices, the big UK charities were on a telephone fundraising bandwagon. The business model was a Wal-Mart one – high volume, low-cost. Agencies were paid on commission based on volume. This meant that some were simply not able to deliver high quality calls for the budgets the charities were prepared to pay. In some cases corners were cut, supporters complained, the media got involved, charities withdrew and most of the telephone fundraising agencies in the UK have now gone bust.

– The first direct mail pen pack was developed by Amnesty in 2009. A pen was included in the pack because it was an instrument of torture that was described in the pack – it was also an instrument of change as the reader was encouraged to use it to fill in the enclosed donation form to support Amnesty. Other charities copied and flooded the market with pens in direct mail packs – missing the point that the pen was included because it was the heart of the campaign. The irony is that the irrelevant pens have in some cases increased response rates. Perhaps some may argue that it doesn’t matter if it helps the charity raise more money, but I think it does if it is out of context and dilutes the art and integrity of a carefully crafted direct mail campaign.

– In the UK Macmillan coffee morning runs throughout September and is the biggest fundraising event for people facing cancer. People get together with friends and family for coffee and cake and make a donation to Macmillan. It raises in the region of £25million each year. Coffee morning absolutely fits with why Macmillan exists – to support people living with cancer. In the UK every other charity has a poor version of the Coffee Morning or is developing one. When I ask people why? The answer, more often than not is, ‘because Macmillan have one.’ We don’t get to the root cause of the problem; the problem isn’t that we don’t have a coffee morning, the problem is that we don’t have a product that inspires our donors, helps them to be part of a movement to change the world. The latest wave of mass participation copycat products is abstinence. Check out Go sober for October, Dryathlon, Dechox and Phoneless Friday.

The result is diluted propositions, a marketplace so crowded that our supporters can’t tell the difference between who they are stopping alcohol and chocolate for, starting drinking coffee or eating cake for or growing facial hair or shaving their head in aid of. The public call fundraisers charity muggers. And we are mugs if we think mindlessly copying each other is the next big thing in innovation.

We compromise our own integrity by copying each other because we are scared of being different and standing out. We talk about innovation but what we really do is more of the same that is safe that someone else has already tested. What works well for one organisation at any point in time may not be the same for another with a different cause and different supporters with different motivations for support.

This is a call for bravery. Focus on the problems that your organisation exists to solve. Invest in supporter insight. Test different ideas. Ban requests for coffee mornings.

We must think differently. By all means copy, but copy the best in the world and make it even better for your audience. Don’t copy and dilute ideas.

A version of this blog was first published at Hilborn.

Business as usual is no longer an agenda item

Monday, April 18, 2016

A guest blog by Iain McAndrew. No one would dispute that the charity sector has found itself under intense scrutiny over the last 12 months. I have no…

Pens, problems and pencils

Wednesday, April 6, 2016

How often do you get so immersed in your day-to-day tasks that you lose sight of the end goal? Are you certain that all the activities you did…

Trying to leave an email list – the good, the bad and the downright ugly

Monday, March 21, 2016

Recently I’ve done more virtual de-cluttering than ever before. Like you, I get a lot of emails. I’m sorry to say that I just don’t have the capacity…

1947 days later. A story of stewardship

Saturday, March 5, 2016

Depending on what research you believe, it’s somewhere between 7 and 24 times more economical to invest in your current supporters than it is to recruit new ones. Research…