The female of the species is more cautious than the male

penguin-funny-blue-water-86405A collaboration blog by Ian Scott and Lucy Gower.

Last year over at Lucidity we developed the innovation animal quiz to help you understand what type of innovator you and your colleagues are so that you can then play to your different strengths to get better results. If you haven’t tried the innovation animal quiz, then give it a go here. (It only takes a couple of minutes)

We also wanted to bust the myth that innovation and creativity is a mystical dark art reserved for the ‘creative people’ and provide a playful way to talk about innovation. For example we think it’s hard to consider innovation a dark art if you are an innovation penguin. (Or any of the animals for that matter)

Over 3,000 people have discovered what innovation animal they are. Bison are most prevalent. Women are more likely to be owls or wolves. Men have a preference for eagles and meerkats. And turtles are few and far between. (If you have a turtle in your team keep hold of them.)

Recently we were scratching our heads to see if we could spot any patterns or uncover what the innovation animals quiz results might mean.

We started by looking at the data on gender and tried to uncover whether there are there any patterns to how men and women approach innovation.*

Is there an innovation gender gap?

The first numbers which leapt out were that men are much more embracing of risk than women. 57% of men when asked said they ‘enjoy the feeling of taking risks’ over ‘finding risk unsettling’. This compared to only 44% of women who enjoyed risk taking. This is congruent with a variety of studies over the years together with research that women are perceived as more risk averse than men. 

It turns out that men’s attention wanders more than women’s. 45% of men answered that their ‘attention starts to wander’ rather than ‘having complete focus on a project until completion’. Only 35% of women declare their attention wanders in this way. Is this a surprise? There’s an age-old gender debate about multi-tasking; that women can do it better than men. There’s also evidence that multi-tasking inhibits creativity and productivity. What are your thoughts? (Let us know because we’re going to delve a bit deeper into this question in an upcoming blog)

And if we look at the two questions about approach to risk and attention span together, over a quarter of men are proper novelty seekers in that they embrace risk and have a short attention span, compared to just 12% of women. Does this mean when it comes to innovation, that men are better at taking risks, failing fast and moving onto the next thing – or do men get bored and throw ideas away too readily without testing thoroughly enough?

According to the innovation animal’s quiz, when it comes to convincing others about their ideas men are marginally more self-confident than women, 69% feel they are good at convincing others (compared to 62% of women). However our data also suggests its men who are slightly more likely to get upset if they’re criticised!

Other findings include that men are more likely to enjoy working on their own, while women are more open to the views of others and collaborating. Researchers from Washington University in St. Louis have studied men and women working in groups. They’ve found that women are more creative and collaborative in groups. However, if you throw a competitive component to the picture, they perform less well, which is exactly the opposite of male groups. For more read here. 

Considerably more men describe themselves as ‘data driven decision makers’, while more women say they have a ‘preference for gut instinct’. With all these questions there is a grey area in terms of how we answer; do we respond with what we perceive our behaviour to be or what our behaviour actually is. The data versus intuition preference for men and women is congruent with several pieces of research that have found that female brains are more connected between right and left hemispheres – an arrangement that facilitates emotional processing, i.e. gut instinct.

The final point that struck us was how the quiz was answered. It has questions on a scale from 1-10 between two points, for example ‘I enjoy the feeling of taking risks’ to ‘I find risk unsettling’. In every one of the 13 questions more women chose the mid-points, somewhere between the two statements, with typically 6% fewer moving towards one or two points from the end of the scale.

It’s obviously difficult to say definitively what drives that tendency; do women spend a little longer in consideration and reach slightly more nuanced conclusions, realising that sometimes the answer to a question is a bit of each? Or is it that women prefer to take less risk, so don’t ‘risk’ a bold answer? Or perhaps men just need to appear decisive?

We’d love to know your views on our initial thoughts as well as what else you would like to know about your innovation animal. Do drop us a line at lucy@lucidity.org.uk and we’ll see what we can do.

Ian Scott has a background in anthropology and statistics and Lucy Gower is director at Lucidity.

Get in touch if you would like some help with your creativity and innovation skills.

*Now, the analysis is not exact because we do not capture gender of respondents, but we do in most cases get names, and while there are quite a few people called Sam – most are pretty clearly male and female so upwards of 90% of names given were useful as we’ve a lot of confidence in what sex Lucy and Ben are.





There’s no such thing as a bad idea

teapot-tea-painting-with-light-smoking-39702I’ve got some news. There is.

There are simply loads of bad ideas. Chocolate teapots, a donut eating competition to fundraise for a diabetes charity and voice activated lifts – and that’s just for starters.

I believe that when you are trying to come up with original and creative ideas, part of the creative process is to have as many ideas as you can. At this stage it’s important not to filter or kill your own or others (good or bad) ideas. You need crazy and bad ideas to help inspire different thinking.

Your challenge is to turn the bad ideas into something brilliant.

The bad ideas aren’t supposed to make it to the marketplace.

I think many bad ideas make it to the marketplace because we start our creativity and innovation at the wrong place. We start with ideas.

The starting place for creativity and innovation isn’t ideas. The starting place are your supporters and beneficiaries.

Good ideas and innovation happen when you can solve a problem for your supporter or beneficiary or spot an opportunity to make their life better. And ‘better’ can be many things, for example, easier, faster, simpler, more exciting, sexier or more meaningful (or a combination of some or all of these things).

When we start the creative process with ideas we fall in love with them. And when we fall in love it’s impossible to be objective. And before you know it your bad idea has been manufactured and your money and reputation is slipping through your fingers.

That’s why the most successful innovations don’t start with an idea. They start with solving problems or making life better for their customer. Why do you think every time you buy something or eat out you are incentivised to give feedback on your experience? The success of TripAdvisor relies on reviews. Starbucks take your feedback and combine it with ethnographic research (observing you when you are in their coffee shops) so they can develop new products and ways of working that meet your needs.

When you know your supporter or beneficiary and innovate around their needs you start to reduce the risks of innovation. Getting to know them and developing ideas for them is far more likely to be successful than your light bulb moment about an idea you’ve fallen in love with.

Sometimes your customer wont know they need your idea; who knew we needed the internet, 10,000 songs in our pocket (iPods) or skinny decaf chai lattes?! Those ideas take more work to catch on – but if you have got your customer insight right they will pay off.

At Lucidity we believe that everyone is creative and an important part of that creative process isn’t starting with ideas. It’s first understanding your supporter or beneficiaries and then using that as inspiration for your ideas and innovation. That’s why we have teamed up with the insight experts at Insight-ful so that together we can help you develop your use of insight as part of your strategy for creativity and innovation.

If you’d like to be able to use the data you have better, or find low-cost ways to gather more data AND learn how to interpret it – get in touch. We’ve also got a new insight for beginners course over at Lucidity that might be right up your street.

It’s time for you to become a disruptor

Monday, May 16, 2016

A guest blog by Iain McAndrew. In this blog, rather than ask more questions, I shall attempt to draw themes together and propose possible ways forward. My late…

Our founders were disrupters – have we lost that disruptive spirit?

Tuesday, May 10, 2016

A guest blog from Iain McAndrew. Innovation is based on the core principle that the present solution may not be the best or only way to approach a…

Raising more to do more is fundamentally broken

Tuesday, May 3, 2016

A guest blog by Iain McAndrew. In my last blog, I expressed my view that raising more to do more is fundamentally broken. If trustees (and I am…

I’ve been Revolutionised!

Sunday, April 24, 2016

A guest blog from Esther Preston about her learning at the recent hospice fundraising masterclass. If Alan Clayton were a preacher his church would be full. Having spent…